phMASTonline
globe

ph060509 table of contents
ph220409 table of contents
ph080409 table of contents
ph250309 table of contents
ph110309 table of contents
ph250209 table of contents
ph110209 table of contents
ph190109 table of contents
LOCAL?
? Hewson keeping the home footy fires burning
? Lack of civil defence personnel a disaster waiting to happen?
? From the Lions to the Lions-Riki?s seen it all now
? Moving on, but staying put in Petone
? Waiwhetu pipeline leaks sighted, sealed and soon to be fixed
? Networking for opportunities
? Hopeful Harbourview
? Autumn weather no issue for indoor holiday programme
? Disaster education starts early
? Older New Zealanders Embrace Tai Chi
? Dancing revival
? Their cup runneth over-26 years on
? Moera faithful still flocking to their hall
? Historian hoping to ?meat? library deadline for new book
? Good news for butchers
? A Goal for the future?
? A ?Maadi? fine effort sees Petone rower take gold
? Pencarrow Rotary welcomes a fine set of speakers




Smaller antenna for Maungaraki in the pipeline
By Chrys Ayley

A resource consent application hearing regarding construction of a 15 metre antenna, close to the water tower in Maungaraki?s Honeysuckle Grove, has been postponed indefinitely. The hearing scheduled for mid-March was cancelled with a few days notice, Wattle Grove resident Colin Williams said. Mr Williams, his partner Charlotte Hinton and locals would have been living close to a ?dominating structure? had plans for construction of a new mast for mobile phone company, NZ Communications gone ahead. Twenty three people filed objections with Hutt City Council and 18 wanted to be heard, he said. However, NZ Communications approached the couple three or four days before the hearing to say they could build a smaller tower of six to eight metres high on the southern side of the reservoir and the hearing, therefore, would be a waste of time. Mr Williams said they did not want a tower to be erected at all but if a tower has to go up and the visual impact is mitigated it would be a good outcome. ?We were fairly happy about that,? he said. ?Our main concern was the visual impact and if a smaller one goes in that?s great.? It is fair to say the community is still divided and there are ?a lot of people still concerned about the radiation.? ?We are fairly satisfied these things are as safe as they can be.? The couple mounted a public protest last November which was well attended by local residents, representatives of NZ Communications Ltd, councillors and politicians. Alternatives to the proposal were discussed including mounting a transmitter on the side of a tower but council was not prepared to let that happen, Mr Williams said. Spokesperson for NZ Communications Anthony Royal confirmed its request to council for the hearing to be postponed. ?We have come up with a proposal for a smaller tower,? he said. The alternative solution of a shorter mast, closer to the water tower needs another few weeks work before residents can hope to hear the outcome, Mr Royal said.

ph250309 STORIES - BACK TO CURRENT ISSUE
About Us | Contact Us | ?2006 Presstige Community Newspapers